
No Magic Left! 'Practical Magic 2' Slammed as Overlong and Predictable in Early Reviews
Sandra Bullock and Nicole Kidman's 28-year wait for a sequel isn't delivering the enchantment fans hoped for, according to critics.
By Dee AlvarezPublished Updated 2 min read
The Owens sisters are officially back on the screen, but critics are already warning pop-culture devotees not to get their hopes up too high. Nearly three decades after the 1998 cult classic first enchanted audiences worldwide, Sandra Bullock and Nicole Kidman have reunited for the long-rumored sequel *Practical Magic 2*. However, the initial critical response suggests this enchanted follow-up fails to conjure the same captivating spell as its predecessor. According to a harsh new review from Variety, the follow-up suffers from being both overlong and distinctly predictable. The outlet highlights that after waiting 28 whole years to see the sisterly duo back in action, viewers might ultimately realize that some beloved movie experiences are better left untouched in our collective memory. Even with two of Hollywood's biggest A-listers leading the charge, the spark seems missing. ## is practical magic 2 worth watching Director Griffin Dunne stepped back behind the camera to guide this new chapter, bringing Bullock and Kidman back to portray their iconic witchy characters, Sally and Gillian Owens. While pure nostalgia is guaranteed to draw in curious viewers, reports indicate the storyline feels cumbersome and needlessly dragged out. Rather than delivering a slick, modern take on the cozy fantasy universe, the picture struggles under the heavy burden of fan expectations. The original 1998 movie was far from a massive critical or financial juggernaut when it first premiered, yet it steadily evolved into an essential comfort watch for generations of movie lovers. The electric, genuine chemistry between Bullock and Kidman became the ultimate backbone of the film, establishing a massive cult following that endures to this day. That intense affection makes any continuation an incredibly tough needle to thread. ## why are practical magic 2 reviews negative Critics argue that trying to capture that specific cinematic lightning in a bottle nearly 30 years later is a near-impossible feat. The new story reportedly fails to offer fresh emotional stakes, relying instead on familiar beats that drag the narrative down across an inflated runtime. Without a tight script, even world-class performers cannot save the pacing from feeling flat. For loyal fans who have championed the Owens family for decades, seeing Bullock and Kidman share top billing once again remains an undeniable draw. Still, the early critical consensus makes one thing glaringly clear: returning to a nostalgic favorite does not always yield a magical outcome.
More like this
TV & Film
Lupita Nyong’o Takes The Stage In Off-Broadway Drama 'Pre-Existing Condition'
The Oscar-winning star headlines Marin Ireland's raw 75-minute play at New York's Greenwich House Theater.
8h ago

TV & Film
Web-Slinger Wins! 'Spider-Man: Brand New Day' Beats 'Star Wars' For All-Time Domestic Box Office Record
Sony's Marvel blockbuster officially dethroned 'The Force Awakens' after a decade at the top with $936.7 million.
12h ago
TV & Film
John Malkovich Keeps It Humble After New Movie Gets a Massive 14-Minute Ovation
The legendary actor stayed grounded while his upcoming film 'Wild Horse Nine' scored a marathon round of applause.
7h ago
Get the pop news brief
One daily email. The biggest celebrity, music and TV stories, no filler.
People also ask
- Is Sandra Bullock in Practical Magic 2?
- Yes, Sandra Bullock returns alongside co-star Nicole Kidman to reprise her role as one of the Owens sisters in the sequel.
- Who directed Practical Magic 2?
- Griffin Dunne directed the sequel, returning to helm the new adaptation featuring Sandra Bullock and Nicole Kidman.
- What are critics saying about Practical Magic 2?
- Early reviews call the sequel overlong and predictable, noting that it fails to capture the charm and magic of the 1998 original.
Reader reaction
Loading comments…